1979 Islamic revolution in Iran, thus theoretical framework
and analysis of the past beyond that, contrary to expectation, not the class structure and theory of Marxists had expected, nor the motivation and “Western political Thought” like “theda skocpol”.
“skocpol” award in 1979 for his analysis of the American Revolution, France and Russia had received in the same year, faced with the revolution that questioned the accuracy of ideas and a big exclamation point condition camping on the East and a huge block views of the larger question mark against Western liberal ideas put.
But what we pay for this opportunity to examine aspects of the student movement and function before and shortly after the Islamic revolution in Iran.
Student Movement in Iran, while the dynamics and mobility has always suffered from confusion, Multiplicity of structure and lack of internal consistency both before and after the revolution, if not most, but some of the problems of the movement. The confusion over the reason that always thought of others and had more than his own, has benefited from Kish and others this question in the minds of Leaders that “from the suffering to go?” And finally in the form of new options and new mold findings, but in most cases cut from one to another is continuous.
In response to the question “of the suffering to go” ? Should be shielded, which “came from where?” And the latter our first decade of the twenty-nine years, but during the first Pahlavi takes. The first movement, where students in Tehran University and the student strike in protest against corruption to university authorities, during preparations for entry to university, we will see Crown, but instead reflection and regret at the same time that activity of this group called fifty and three people, led by “T. Arani” more around the study of Marxism and the Trade Union activities, was admitted to the formation of the “Tudeh Party” ; party later in the nationalization of the oil industry along the imperialist policies of the Soviet Union way betrayed the nation and the students who passed across the first integrated student organizations in Iran called Tehran University student organization “to supporting the Party had formed, prompted the opposition National Front, and oil nationalization protests and rallies to .
The only impact student movement of students and not later after the revolution the Marxist mass and armed guerrillas, revolutionary front against the Muslim students formed. But after the betrayal of the Party and nation policy and political party affiliated to the Soviet Union, other students could not find the image of students and Marxist ideology that believes that due to certain revolutionary spirits was a university student, the Party not force it back with Affected movement armed left Cuba and Vietnam, this time sacrificed in the form of “Khalqh guerrillas”, who appeared to range leadership “bijan Jazani” (students of Tehran University) and “Abbas Sorky” in the first action in 1346 and disbanded under the leadership of other spectrum “Masoud Ahmadzadeh” and “Amir Hossein Pouyan” in fifty decades was suppressed, but the two spectra in jail king’s most important ideological formed.
Student Marxism in Iran while it began as the first claimants who arose from the wealthy classes of society were (at that time there were no conditions for free education) and those actually born as bourgeois “Iraj Eskandari” (Fifty-three members of the Party leader was later) could not reflective of the proletariat and the poor people of the society and language, they say, but “went West to lose with the East” had never been followed by revolution and political reform Marxist ideology based on demand said. On the other hand, in the framework of the liberal National Front was formed at the University, although the internal consistency as the Organization, Tehran University students “did not have, but also effected spectrum of what “Mossadegh” before July twenty-eighth and What the coup as “the Iranian National Resistance Movement never were revolutionary because its more “Mossadegh” was not a revolutionary and reformist was a revolutionary leader and twenty-eight-month period showed his power, derived from the National Front in the form of higher authority and a bureaucratic system can fit up to a charismatic authority and leadership rely on the masses.
As intellectual obstruction and persistent failures in dealing with “Shah” National Front, the likes of Mr. “Bazargan“ to freedom of movement with the spirit of revolution and religion more than “forced, half the students who also had a look at this flow followed by weakness and low ideological work in the fields of intellectual and political movement passivity and vacuum action in the fight against the king in creating a new association called “Mojahedin e khalgh Organization of Iran (MKO)”, Movements because “Muslim, Iranian, Mossadeghian, and believe in the constitution the king” and were not able to race the likes of “Hanif nejad”, “Muslim, revolutionary and ideological” and had twenty eighth August of “Mossadegh” and the Shah’s constitutional were disappointing, to satisfy
.
But the roots of Islamic Associations of new students was because their activities in communities outside the university during the Freedom Movement and National Front and were followed for instance “Hanif nejad” the first secretary of Association Islamic universities of Tehran, the responsibility for Tuesday National Front, Freedom Movement and the Islamic Association of Tehran University Faculty of Agriculture was in charge.
Early decades of Islamic Associations of twenty established and later contributed to the freedom of movement, then work with it had reached a dead end and as a result of this deadlock in the form of a nine-page letter that nine including Mohammad “Hanif nejad” and “Mohsen Saeed” wrote the movement, the cut, but his relationship with the likes of” merchant “and maintained business with its own interpretation to defend their pay.
This dependence on intellectual way that books such as “by way during the” great ideological work from the beginning of his “Mujahideen” was working with business ideas began with the thought “Ayatollah Taleghani” and “Allameh Jafari” link next to eat, but when fourteen volumes, “Description Masnavi” and “interpretation Nahjolbalaghe” (Allameh Jafari) and “modern interpretation” (Ayatollah Taleghani), books such as “What should I do?” (Lenin), “biogenesis” (Aparyn), “philosophical paper” (Mao), “dialectical materialism and historical materialism” (Stalin) and of “Marx” and with “Massoud Rajavi” and “T. Shahram” Turbulent thought to Marxist ideology, “Bijan Jazani” and “Masoud Ahmadzadeh”, Showed, “Fadaiyan” Marxist perspective on religion Background of Mujahideen prevailed and in the absence “Hanif nejad “, “Mohsen Saeed” and innovative “Asghar baadie zadegan” which Fifty years and one was executed, the second generation of “Mujahideen” from the first generation cross, and joined the ranks of Marxist guerrillas.
Such that the MEK from the heart of “Islamic Associations” stood with “Freedom Movement” conference, with party or … and eventually merged the “Fedaian” was lost and back to forum Islamism and its intellectual fathers such as “Ayatollah Taleghani” and the “bazargan” and then “Majid Sharif vaghefi”, “M. Samadie Labbaf” and other Muslims sacrificed their thinking “Taghi Shahram”, “Bahram Aram” and “bahman bazargani” has, in the form ” Organization of People’s Freedom Fight in the way “than to fight it with the king as well as creating his own obstacles.
So that after the Revolution, while Tehran’s School of Engineering School of Science and Chang MKO Fedai e khalgh” was filled, Marxists had everything possible in front of people and their government was working and eventually conflict Tabriz University Islamic Society was forced to throw the Cultural Revolution to purge the university and demanded to be armed guerrillas that the university had become a battlefield.
But the Association of Islamic Students, like MEK Prfraz fate and were bent, and Daman, “the Ayatollah Taleghani” indiscriminately and with “bazargan” in the “nehzat azadi” and Joined with “Shariati” thought were rich in color and follow the handling “Colonization” tried and made from revolutionary material such “Alavi Shi’ism” in “Safavi Shi’ism” through and intellectuals, with business so that eventually they rub on November thirteenth year 1358 U.S. embassy seizure, although believed to be the end of the interim government, but in other revolutionary “Bazargan” went to the side of Islamic Associations of the most important pillar of the Islamic Revolution in stability early Revolution; and because the interpretation of “Yervand Abrahamian,” “The followers “Shariati” were in disbelief action, called “Ayatollah Khomeini” to the ”Imam”.” (Yervand Abrahamian – Iran between two revolutions), but this is not the end of the student movement work, now is still small stream that three or four decades late born and what the Forum Islamic students in the late idolatrous have crossed it will search again, hoping that perhaps lost in the likes of his National Front and intellectual currents of the test data to find the time. Although lost before the new Are ahead from their predecessors a step, because if they are national-religious and religious intellectuals, they have the religion of the past, just that the nationalists he is in doubt because “Ali Afshari” and “Akbar Atri” as the current index figures, the nation also are sold to enemies.
But it must be stressed that today’s movement to Muslim students after the period of ups and downs Abundant three decades after the Islamic revolution, remains on track to students who have “followed the Imam’s Line” and is definitely called Community Islamic students as the most important place in the presence of such strategic importance of students possessing is.